50
Shades of Grey: to Read or Not to Read?
I
can’t recommend that you read E.L. James’ 50
Shades of Grey trilogy. On the other hand, I can’t recommend that you not
read it. Wait, what? How can you recommend reading it AND not reading it?
Here’s how: the books aren’t bad, but at the same time, they’re awful. 50 Shades has some definite flaws;
however, it has positives that balance the negatives. In this review, I’ll
address the good, the bad, and the ugly of 50
Shades of Grey and its sequels.
First,
the good. The story’s character development is quite appealing. Christian Grey
is a round, dynamic character. In the beginning of the tale, he is emotionally
closed off because of psychological damage due to sexual abuse as a teen and
parental abandonment as a child. You have to admit, those are good reasons for
mental issues. As a result of his emotional trauma, Grey is jealous,
possessive, and controlling. These are things we do not want to see in a mate, and this seems to be one of the chief
complaints of many reviewers. Over the course of the books, though, he allows
himself to heal and learns to accept love. While his possessiveness and need to
control others’ lives is troubling, he does learn to let his loved ones be
independent by trusting them not to hurt him. That is enormous progress; by the
end of the series, Grey is emotionally healthier, and therefore a much better person
& spouse.
Anastasia
Steele doesn’t grow quite as much as Grey, but her character development is,
nonetheless, important. She learns important grown-up lessons, like standing up
for her own needs. In the beginning of the story, she is hopelessly naïve. In
the course of the story, she learns to assert herself and not let Grey
completely control her life. For example, when she leaves Grey at the end of
the first novel, she is standing up for her independence—even though she should
have told him to stop, at least she knows that she can’t relinquish her
autonomy entirely. Steele’s most important function in the story is that she is
the driving force behind Grey’s growth. Because of his desire (and eventually
love) for Steele, Grey must learn to trust. Because he must learn to trust, he
has to let go of his past. Because he let’s go of the past, Grey’s emotional
wounds heal. All because of Steele. Not because of her actions, but because of
her existence. I could argue that this points to a girl power theme. (I won’t,
because I don’t think that Steele grows enough, but it’s possible.)
I’ve
established that James’ character development in the 50 Shades series is good. Now I’ll address the bad. The plot is
mediocre. The underlying premise is good (albeit somewhat trite): injured hero
is rescued by tenacious heroine. He heals; she learns. They all live happily
ever after. The only difference between this and the standard fairy tale motif
is the male/female role reversal. I enjoy retells of the classics, especially
when they have a fun twist (Shrek and Tangled are a couple of my favorite
animated movies, and E.D. Baker’s The
Frog Princess series is one of my all-time favorites. Spoofs of fairy tales
always grab my reading attention.) In this respect, 50 Shades is okay. Going beyond the fairytale theme, though, the
story is weak. My biggest complaint about the plot is that it is repetitive. I
could swear that James repeated—verbatim!—entire passages throughout the books.
It seems like she would copy and paste sections when she couldn’t be bothered
with either editing them out (the best option) or varying them (not as good as
eliminating the chaff, but better than just repeating). I don’t have any
examples handy, and I don’t want to reread the books to find any, but if you do
choose to read the trilogy, you’ll see what I mean. On the topic of repetition,
in the sex scenes—one of the big draws for so many who love the books—there’s
similarly little variety. If you read one sex scene, you can skip the other 5
bazillion. By my estimation, half of the story is made up of sex scenes. James
could have cut many hundreds of pages by leaving some to the reader’s
imagination. I feel that a story (just like an essay) should be like a skirt:
long enough to cover the important bits, but short enough to keep it
interesting. In this respect, the author failed. James seems not to trust her
readers to do the work of using their imagination as they read. There’s nothing
wrong with explicit descriptions, but there’s a problem with the same exact
explicitness over and over and over again.
Having
addressed the good and the bad, I’m ready to tackle the ugly. The writing is
execrable. It made me cringe! James’ use of language is an affront to readers
& writers alike. A few of her sins on this front are: poor word choice,
lack of variety in description (I know I addressed that in the previous
paragraph), punctuation & grammar errors, and lack of figurative language.
She could have saved herself a few demerits by using some good similies and
metaphors in her descriptions. In one of the books, Steele “murmurs soundlessly”
(or maybe she “mutters wordlessly. I don’t remember which, and I feel no need
to subject myself to rereading the whole trilogy just to jog my memory). My
problem with this is that it is physically impossible. The nature of a
murmur is that it is a sound (likewise, the nature of muttering is that it
contains words). Added to this, James was either not motivated enough or not
creative enough to describe thoughtfully. Here is where a few metaphors would
have come in handy. Grey has a pair of jeans that he wears “that way.” What
does “that way” mean? Is it appearance? Attitude? I don’t know, because James
didn’t write the story such that I, as a reader, could figure it out. While I
do feel that a writer needs to let the reader use imagination, vague or
nonexistent descriptions are taking that too far. James flipped where she
should have included description and where she should have cut words. So, there
it is: the ugly is poor language use—the ultimate writer’s sin.
Should you read 50 Shades of Grey or not? I can’t tell you. All I can say is that
the story has it’s good points in character development, but it also has bad
& ugly points in plot and language. Pick your poison: enjoy the characters
while being subjected to uncreative plot and lousy writing, or skip the crap
and miss the good character development.